Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Ductility Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Beam Sections under Simple Bending According to Strain Domains

Abstract

Ductility is a central requirement in the flexural design of reinforced concrete beams because it governs the capacity of a section to undergo inelastic deformation before losing resistance. The aim of this narrative review is to examine the relationship between neutral-axis depth, strain compatibility, reinforcement condition and curvature ductility in reinforced concrete sections subjected to simple bending. Peer-reviewed analytical, numerical and experimental studies were analyzed qualitatively, distinguishing conventional steel reinforcement from fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP), hybrid steel–FRP, ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) and steel-fiber systems. The literature shows that under-reinforced sections, in which the tensile reinforcement yields before concrete crushing, provide a more ductile response than over-reinforced sections. As the neutral axis deepens and the compression zone becomes dominant, the available deformation capacity decreases and failure becomes more brittle. Compression reinforcement, confinement, fiber-reinforced cementitious materials and hybrid steel–FRP reinforcement can modify this response, although the conventional yield-based definition of ductility must be applied with caution when non-yielding FRP reinforcement is used. Neutral-axis depth is a useful design indicator but should not be treated as an isolated or universal measure of ductility, because material properties, reinforcement ratios, confinement, geometry and the adopted definition of ultimate curvature also govern sectional behavior. The findings support a strain-compatible, mechanism-based assessment of ductility rather than reliance on reinforcement strength alone. From a sustainable-construction standpoint, these mechanisms inform durability-oriented detailing, material-efficient reinforcement selection and service-life considerations, but the reviewed studies do not establish comparative life-cycle environmental benefits.

Keywords

Reinforced concrete, Flexural ductility, Neutral axis, Strain domains, Curvature ductility, Beam sections, Moment–curvature response, FRP reinforcement, Sustainable construction, Durability, Service life, Material efficiency

PDF

References

  1. Mairone M, Maragno G, Masera D, et al. Strength and ductility of hybrid steel and FRP reinforced concrete sections subjected to combined axial and bending regime. Infrastructures. 2026;11(5):170. doi:10.3390/infrastructures11050170
  2. Nogueira CG, Rodrigues I. New design model of reinforced concrete beams in bending considering the ductility factor. Rev IBRACON Estrut Mater. 2020;13(1):120–41. doi:10.1590/S1983-41952020000100009
  3. Foroughi S, Yuksel S. A new approach for determining the curvature ductility of reinforced concrete beams. Slovak J Civ Eng. 2022;30(1):8–20. doi:10.2478/sjce-2022-0002
  4. Tamayo J, García G. Reassessment of the flexural behavior of high-strength reinforced concrete beams under short-term loads. SN Appl Sci. 2021;3. doi:10.1007/s42452-021-04190-7
  5. Qiu MH, Hu YQ, Shao X, et al. Experimental investigation on flexural and ductile behaviors of rebar-reinforced ultra-high-performance concrete beams. Struct Concr. 2022;23:1533–54. doi:10.1002/suco.202100794
  6. Renić T, Kišiček T. Ductility of concrete beams reinforced with FRP rebars. Buildings. 2021;11(9):424. doi:10.3390/buildings11090424
  7. Yang IH, Park J, Bui TQ, et al. An experimental study on the ductility and flexural toughness of ultrahigh-performance concrete beams subjected to bending. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(10):2225. doi:10.3390/ma13102225
  8. Alsomiri M, Liu Z, Wang T, et al. Ductility-oriented design of UHPC T-beams: mechanical model and design recommendations. Struct Concr. 2024;26:425–48. doi:10.1002/suco.202400214
  9. Shewalul YW. Numerical and FEA investigation of sectional capacity and moment redistribution behavior of steel fiber reinforced concrete (SFRC) beam. Heliyon. 2021;7:e07354. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07354
  10. Gómez-Martínez F, Pérez-García A. Yielding and ultimate deformations of wide and deep reinforced concrete beams. Buildings. 2022;12(11):2015. doi:10.3390/buildings12112015
  11. Bellos J, Konstantinidis A. Systematic calculation of yield and failure curvatures of reinforced concrete cross-sections. Buildings. 2024;14(3):826. doi:10.3390/buildings14030826
  12. Belhocine M, Benyahi K, Bouafia Y, et al. Nonlinear analysis methods for reinforced concrete structural elements subjected to static and dynamic loads. J Appl Eng Sci. 2024;14:202–11. doi:10.2478/jaes-2024-0025
  13. Pham T, Hong W. Investigation of strain evolutions in prestressed reinforced concrete beams based on nonlinear finite element analyses considering concrete plasticity and concrete damaged plasticity. J Asian Archit Build Eng. 2021;21:448–68. doi:10.1080/13467581.2020.1869014
  14. Thamrin R, Zaidir Z, Iwanda D. Ductility estimation for flexural concrete beams longitudinally reinforced with hybrid FRP–steel bars. Polymers (Basel). 2022;14(5):1017. doi:10.3390/polym14051017
  15. Ali NM. Finite element analysis of flexural behavior in ultra-high-strength concrete beams with BFRP and hybrid BFRP-steel reinforcement. Sci Rep. 2025;16. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-32867-1